Certified - CompTIA Project+

In the execution phase, the project manager’s job shifts into a mode of active coordination and oversight. Work is happening across teams, vendors are delivering their parts, and decisions need to be made quickly to keep things on track. Three core activities help keep this moving: well-run meetings, strong vendor management, and effective status reporting. These aren’t just administrative tasks—they’re the framework for transparency, accountability, and timely decision-making. By managing them consistently, you catch problems earlier, adjust plans sooner, and keep progress visible to everyone involved.
Meetings are one of the most common tools in execution, but they need to have a clear purpose. They give the team a regular rhythm for updates, help resolve issues before they grow, and reinforce priorities. The frequency and audience will vary depending on how complex the project is, but the key is to keep the cadence steady. When done well, meetings build momentum and keep everyone engaged in moving the work forward.
There are several meeting types you might use during execution. Daily standups are short check-ins focused on immediate progress, blockers, and next steps. Weekly team meetings go deeper into deliverables, dependencies, and schedule updates. Stakeholder meetings keep sponsors and clients informed at a higher level and give them a chance to provide feedback. Steering committee meetings happen less often but focus on strategic decisions, major approvals, and course corrections.
Preparing for meetings is just as important as holding them. A clear agenda should be sent in advance so participants know what’s coming. Everyone attending should have reviewed any relevant data or materials before the session. The facilitator—often the project manager—should be ready with any necessary reports, visuals, or summaries of issues. A meeting that starts with everyone prepared is far more productive and requires less follow-up work afterward.
Managing the meeting itself means keeping discussions focused and outcomes clear. Each agenda item should have a time limit and a goal, whether that’s making a decision or confirming next steps. The facilitator guides the conversation, ensures all voices are heard, and stops side conversations from taking over. Key decisions and action items need to be recorded as they happen so nothing is lost. Ending with a recap and agreed-upon actions ensures everyone leaves knowing what comes next.
Common pitfalls can derail the value of meetings. Without structure, discussions can go in circles and people disengage. Poor documentation leads to confusion later about what was decided or who is responsible. Having the wrong people in the room can waste time or create unnecessary conflict. And overscheduling—too many meetings with too little purpose—leads to fatigue and less time spent on actual execution work.
Following up on action items is where you show that meetings lead to real progress. Every task should have an owner, a deadline, and enough context to avoid misunderstandings. The project manager should maintain a live tracker across recurring meetings and check for updates each time. Items that are overdue need escalation or re-prioritization. When the team sees that action items are taken seriously, it builds a culture of follow-through.
Vendor oversight becomes a major part of execution once external partners start delivering. Vendors need to be monitored to ensure they meet agreed-upon scope, quality standards, and deadlines. This includes structured check-ins, tracking against service-level agreements, and verifying milestone completions. While vendors are partners in delivering the project, they still require formal performance management to stay aligned. Poor vendor alignment can impact costs, schedules, and client confidence.
Onboarding vendors effectively during execution is critical. Roles, responsibilities, and points of contact should be clarified right from the start. Scope documents and deliverables need to be reviewed and confirmed. Any required access—such as to systems, files, or secure environments—must be handled promptly, along with agreement on formats and standards. The smoother this onboarding, the faster vendors can start delivering without early missteps.
Managing vendor deliverables means connecting them directly to project milestones or contractual obligations. Each deliverable should have agreed acceptance criteria and built-in review points. If something arrives late or below quality standards, the issue should be escalated immediately, with responses guided by the contract. Project managers often use logs, review processes, or scorecards to track vendor performance over time.
When vendor performance issues arise, speed and professionalism are essential. The contract should outline escalation procedures, possible penalties, and dispute resolution steps. Depending on severity, the procurement team or project sponsor may need to be involved. Delaying action allows problems to grow and affect more areas of the project. Escalation is about protecting the project’s interests while trying to keep the relationship constructive.
Maintaining a communication cadence with vendors is one of the simplest ways to avoid problems. Regular check-ins—whether through calls, status reports, or site visits—keep expectations aligned and issues visible. Where relevant, vendors should be included in planning meetings so their work stays synchronized with the broader schedule. Consistent contact builds trust and reduces misunderstandings that can derail delivery.
Ultimately, meetings and vendor oversight are about maintaining alignment. Meetings keep internal and external teams working toward the same goals, while vendor oversight ensures that outside contributions meet the project’s standards. Both areas require active, ongoing management to keep execution momentum. Strong communication and disciplined follow-up are the habits that turn plans into consistent delivery.
For more cyber related content and books, please check out cyber author dot me. Also, there are other prepcasts on Cybersecurity and more at Bare Metal Cyber dot com.
Status reporting is one of the most important oversight tools in execution. It’s how you keep stakeholders informed about the health of the project, the progress being made, and the risks that need attention. A good status report connects performance to the baselines you set earlier, shows where things are on track, and calls out where adjustments might be needed. Reports must be timely, accurate, and shaped to the audience—they’re about providing clarity, not just pushing data. When done consistently, they build trust and allow for proactive decisions before problems escalate.
Different audiences need different types of status reports. Internal team reports focus on task-level updates, blockers, and what’s coming next. Stakeholder reports step back and summarize scope, cost, schedule, and risk so decision-makers can see the big picture. Executive dashboards give a quick view of high-level KPIs, trends, and strategic alignment without overwhelming detail. You might also create ad hoc reports to address specific escalations, major change impacts, or urgent incidents.
An effective status report always covers the essentials—what’s been completed, what’s planned next, and what’s currently at risk. It should make clear how progress compares to milestones and baselines. Many reports also include summaries of recent decisions, updates on risks, and any approved or pending changes. Visual elements like red-amber-green indicators can make it easier to scan and quickly grasp where attention is needed.
Key performance indicators give these reports real weight. Depending on the project, you might track earned value, velocity, defect rates, or other metrics tied directly to your objectives. These numbers show trends that narrative updates alone might miss. Selecting the right KPIs is about relevance—metrics should tie back to the project’s goals and matter to the people receiving the report. Adding context on why numbers are moving and what’s being done about it adds value beyond just listing the figures.
When scope, cost, or schedule variances appear, they need to be reported clearly. This means quantifying the variance, explaining its cause, and stating its impact on the project. Thresholds defined earlier in the plan help you know when a variance is minor or when it requires escalation. Root cause analysis helps determine whether the problem came from inside the project or from external factors. Status reports should also note if baseline changes are being considered or already approved.
The frequency of reporting should match the project’s governance rhythm. Weekly or biweekly reports are common for core teams and sponsors. Steering committees might only need monthly updates or milestone-driven reports. The key is to provide information early enough for it to be reviewed before decision-making meetings. Late reports reduce their usefulness because they limit the time to act.
Automating parts of the reporting process can save time and improve consistency. Many project management tools can generate dashboards directly from live data, reducing the manual effort of pulling numbers together. Templates help keep the look and structure of reports consistent, but automation doesn’t replace review. The project manager still needs to ensure the report tells the right story, reflects current realities, and provides the necessary context.
Status doesn’t have to live only in formal reports. Updates can be delivered in meetings, through email summaries, or via chat platforms, as long as they align with the official record. Executive briefings or quick verbal updates may be needed for senior leaders who want key points without reading a full report. Matching the communication style to the audience ensures the message is both heard and understood.
Stakeholder questions are a natural part of status reporting. They may challenge the accuracy of forecasts, question the basis of decisions, or probe into risks and issues. Being ready with evidence, supporting documentation, and clear explanations shows confidence and preparedness. Encouraging open discussion builds stronger engagement and creates opportunities for collaborative problem-solving.
Status reports aren’t the end of the process—they feed directly back into planning and execution. Reviewing the findings with the team can lead to replanning, reforecasting, or reallocating resources. These reporting cycles act as a feedback loop, helping prevent delays from spreading or issues from going unnoticed. The value of reporting comes from how quickly and effectively you use it to adjust course.
Reports should be stored in a central repository with proper version control. This makes them easy to access for audits, lessons learned sessions, or future project planning. Stakeholders should be able to find past reports without having to request them. Well-documented history strengthens governance, maintains transparency, and provides a reference point for similar projects in the future.
Together, meetings, vendor oversight, and status reporting form the backbone of execution-phase management. Meetings keep teams aligned, vendor oversight ensures outside contributions meet expectations, and status reporting ties everything together by showing progress and issues in real time. By managing these elements with consistency, you maintain clarity, drive performance, and keep stakeholders confident in the project’s direction.